hey! i came across this interesting poll in one of the orkut communities that im a member of:

is it fair to claim "it is a creation that has a creator" only beacuse u do not have any idea how it came into existence??
Created by: Hrishi ~~*ChAKdE

poll link:
http://www.orkut.com/CommPollResults.aspx?cmm=686202&pct=1185946779&pid=58418310

communitylink:
http://www.orkut.com/Community.aspx?cmm=686202

to read wat others have posted, follow the first link above. here's my comment...

This was a poll and i found it VERY interesting. i think it deserves a thread of its own.

here's my comment (posted it on the poll too)...

The statement, is it fair to claim "it is a creation that has a creator" only beacuse u do not have any idea how it came into existence?? made by poll 'creator' is based on the following assumptions:
1)Creation = An Entity
2)Creator = Creator of that Entity

The problem would be solved if we reject the above assumptions as true.

A human mind perhaps cannot digest the idea that an entity can come into existence without a creator.
Consider this:

Hydrogen+Oxygen=Water

so who created water?

water JUST came in to 'being' by combination of Hydrogen and Oxygen. 'Creation' can be Circumstantial.

Human mind is very complex. It takes a lot of things for granted. It functions dat way. some kinda fuzzy logic going inside our brains...